Rossum is an enterprise intelligent document processing platform for transactional paperwork: invoices, purchase orders, bills of lading, and sales orders, written back into SAP or NetSuite after an approval workflow. Its published Starter plan begins at $18,000 per year on a one-year minimum contract, and the three tiers above it are quote only. ReceiptOCR reads invoices and receipts, returns vendor, date, line items, tax, and total, and exports Excel, CSV, or JSON with no contract and no sales call. Upload a document below and compare the fields yourself.
Upload your receipts and invoices
Drop files here or click to upload
Up to 50 files
Uploading...
Rossum built a serious platform for organizations processing tens of thousands of transactional documents a year through an approval chain and into an ERP. The pricing reflects exactly that buyer. If your requirement is a folder of invoices and receipts turned into a spreadsheet, you are being quoted for machinery you will never switch on.
The Rossum pricing page lists Starter as starting at $18,000 per year. That is the only public dollar figure on the page. Business, Enterprise, and Ultimate are all quote only, so the real number for real volume arrives after a demo.
Rossum states a minimum contract length of one year. There is no month-to-month option and no self-serve checkout, which means a purchase decision, a procurement review, and a signature before a single invoice is read.
Rossum lists invoices, purchase orders, bills of lading, sales orders, and tonnage certificates. Its own platform page describes the product as not receipt-specific. If expense receipts are your document, you are buying an invoice platform and hoping.
Rossum prices on the volume of pages or documents plus the complexity of your workflows. No per-page rate is published. Overage means upgrading a tier or paying an additional page rate that does not appear anywhere on the site.
ReceiptOCR sells the extraction step on its own. There is no workflow engine, no ERP connector, and no annual commitment attached to it. Upload receipts and invoices together, check the fields, and download the spreadsheet.
Thermal receipts, restaurant checks, fuel slips, and vendor bills all read through the same extraction. You do not choose a document platform by which paperwork it happens to specialize in.
Rossum markets accuracy that improves after ten to twenty documents of your layout. There is nothing to learn here. The engine reads a vendor it has never seen because it was never built on templates.
Pay for the documents you process. No annual floor, no per-user fee, and no tier upgrade because a colleague needed a login.
Vendor, date, invoice number, subtotal, sales tax, and total, plus every line with description, quantity, and unit price where the document carries them.
Excel, CSV, JSON, and QuickBooks-ready files. Feed a ledger, a spreadsheet, or the platform you already pay for, without a connector project.
Every extracted field is visible and editable before the file leaves. A confidently wrong total is worse than a blank one, so you see the data first.
If capture was the part of Rossum you needed, this comparison takes one afternoon, not one quarter.
Fifty documents that match your real mix. Include the vendors whose layouts change every quarter and the scans nobody wants to open.
Tip: Add ten expense receipts. Rossum does not target receipts, so this is where the comparison separates fastest.
Compare header fields and line items against what your current pipeline returns. Extraction quality is measurable on your own documents, so measure it rather than compare marketing pages.
Take Excel, CSV, or a QuickBooks-ready file. If the output feeds an application, the same engine is available over a REST API.
Built for US teams whose honest requirement was accurate extraction and a clean file, not an enterprise document platform with approval routing and ERP write-back.
A few hundred vendor bills and a pile of receipts each month. An $18,000 annual floor is more than the bookkeeping costs.
Many clients, lumpy volume, and a spreadsheet or ledger at the end. An annual enterprise commitment is the wrong shape for seasonal work.
You already own the workflow. You want reliable JSON out of a document without buying somebody else's orchestration layer and signing for a year.
The demo was impressive, the ERP connector was scoped, and the invoices are still being keyed by hand. Extraction alone would have shipped in a week.
Rossum, at rossum.ai, describes itself as an AI-first market leader in intelligent document processing, with the tagline "AI Document Processing For Transactional Workflows." Underneath the marketing is a proprietary model it calls Rossum Aurora AI, a transactional large language model that its site says covers 276 languages and handles handwriting. On top of the model sit AI agents that read a document, capture and validate the data, handle email correspondence with the sender, and route the result through an approval workflow.
The documents it targets are transactional paperwork: invoices, purchase orders, bills of lading, sales orders, and tonnage certificates. This matters more than anything else on this page. Rossum's own platform page describes the product as not receipt-specific, and there is no receipt product, no receipt pricing, and no receipt landing page anywhere on the site. If you arrived here searching for a receipt scanner, Rossum is not a competitor you rejected. It is a competitor that never entered your category.
One note on the name. Searching for Rossum on its own is ambiguous in the US: it returns Emmy Rossum the actress, Rossum Electro-Music the synthesizer maker founded by Dave Rossum of E-mu, and Rossum's Universal Robots, the 1920 Karel Capek play that gave the world the word robot. The document company is rossum.ai.
Everything in this table appeared on the Rossum pricing page in July 2026. Confirm on rossum.ai before you buy. Third-party review sites quote per-page rates that Rossum does not publish anywhere.
| Rossum plan | Listed price (July 2026) | What it adds |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | Starting at $18,000 per year | Core capture and validation, unlimited users |
| Business | Quote only | Custom business logic, master data matching, integrations, workflow reporting |
| Enterprise | Quote only, marked recommended | SSO, sandbox, document translation, custom branding |
| Ultimate | Quote only | Multi-document transactions, 3-year archive instead of 12 months |
Rossum states that pricing is based on the volume of pages or documents you process and the complexity of your workflows. Exceed your allowance and you either move up a tier or pay for additional pages at a rate the site does not publish. The minimum contract length is one year. Seats are unlimited on every tier, which is genuinely generous and a real advantage over per-user expense platforms. A 14-day trial exists, and the site pushes a demo hard.
Read that structure carefully, because it tells you who the product is for. An $18,000 entry point with an annual commitment and three quote-gated tiers above it is priced for a finance organization replacing a team of keyers, measured against a salary line. It is not priced for a business that wants a spreadsheet by Friday, and Rossum has never pretended otherwise.
Rossum publishes no blanket accuracy percentage, which is more honest than most of this industry. What it publishes are named customer results: 90% accuracy after only 10 documents at the Port of Rotterdam, 92.6% accuracy after only 20 documents at Adyen, a 71% straight-through processing rate at Morton Salt, and 44% fewer errors at Wolt. It also claims high accuracy with zero hallucinations through continuous learning.
Two of those numbers measure different things, and the difference is the single most misread statistic in document AI. Extraction accuracy asks whether the field was right. Straight-through processing rate, or touchless rate, asks how often no human touched the document. A 71% STP rate says nothing about whether the totals in the other 29% were correct, and a 90% field accuracy still means one field in ten needs a human. If you see a flat 99% attributed to Rossum on a review site, note that no such figure appears on Rossum's own pages. We wrote a longer piece on why receipt OCR accuracy claims collapse under inspection.
The other thing worth noticing in those case studies is the phrase after only 10 documents. That is a continuous-learning system describing its ramp. It gets better once it has seen your layouts. A model that reads an unfamiliar vendor correctly on the first document has no ramp to describe.
These products do not compete. One automates an accounts payable process end to end. One reads a document and gives you the data. Comparing them on a feature grid is only useful if you are honest about which column you actually need.
| Capability | Rossum | ReceiptOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Invoice extraction | Yes, the core product | Yes |
| Expense receipt extraction | Not a stated document type | Yes, a first-class document type |
| Line item extraction | Yes | Yes |
| Approval routing and workflows | Yes, rule-based routing | No |
| Posting data into an ERP | Yes, native NetSuite, SAP, Dynamics, Workday, Coupa | Export a QuickBooks-ready file, no write-back |
| Handwriting and 276 languages | Yes, per its own claims | Print and typed documents, US English focus |
| Compliance posture | ISO 27001, ISO 42001, SOC 2 Type II, TX-RAMP, GDPR, CCPA | TLS in transit, documents deleted after processing |
| Pricing model | Annual contract, from $18,000 per year, tiers quote-gated | Flat, by document volume, no minimum |
| Time to first result | Demo, trial, contract, onboarding ramp | Upload and read the fields |
Buy Rossum when the document is the start of a process rather than the end of one. If a supplier invoice has to be validated against your master vendor data, routed to a cost-center owner for approval, and written into NetSuite with the original PDF attached, then the platform is the product and the annual contract is the cost of doing business. Rossum publishes a dedicated NetSuite integration that pushes validated data plus the source PDF into the ERP, and it names SAP, Microsoft Dynamics, Workday, and Coupa among its connectors, alongside RPA tools like UiPath and Blue Prism.
Its compliance posture also clears procurement in places a lightweight tool will not. Rossum's trust page lists ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023 for AI management, a completed SOC 2 Type II audit, TX-RAMP Level 1, and GDPR and CCPA compliance, with AWS hosting including a US region. If a security questionnaire stands between you and the purchase, that matters. Note that HIPAA, PCI DSS, and FedRAMP are claimed for Rossum on various third-party profiles and do not appear on Rossum's own trust page, so verify anything compliance-critical directly with them.
Rossum positions itself against Kofax and Tungsten Automation, ABBYY, and Hyperscience. Those are the products it wants to be compared with, and it is telling that no receipt tool appears on that list. If your shortlist looks like theirs, you are in the enterprise IDP market and you should run a real evaluation.
Skip the platform when the honest description of your job is turning documents into rows. That is most businesses. You have an accountant, a ledger, and a process that already works; what you do not have is somebody willing to key four hundred line items a month.
For expense receipts that means receipt OCR software in a browser, or the receipt OCR API when the output feeds an application. For vendor bills, invoice OCR software handles the header fields and the line items, and the invoice OCR API returns the same as JSON. Firms clearing client batches export from the bulk receipt scanner, and businesses posting their own books scan receipts into QuickBooks from the same file.
If the reason Rossum appeared on your shortlist was accounts payable specifically, read the invoice processing software comparison before you commit, because the AP category prices very differently from extraction. If you are evaluating the whole category rather than one vendor, the intelligent document processing overview explains what the platforms include and which parts most buyers never use. And if you are comparing developer APIs, the Veryfi alternative and Nanonets alternative pages cover the minimum commitment and the prepaid credit models respectively.
As of July 2026 the Rossum pricing page lists one public figure: Starter starting at $18,000 per year. Business, Enterprise, and Ultimate are quote only. Pricing scales with document volume and workflow complexity, the minimum contract length is one year, and seats are unlimited on every tier. A 14-day trial is available before you commit.
Rossum positions itself against Kofax and Tungsten Automation, ABBYY, and Hyperscience on its own comparison pages. Buyers also weigh Nanonets, Docsumo, Amazon Textract, Google Document AI, and Azure Document Intelligence. If you only ever needed the extraction step, an extraction tool such as ReceiptOCR returns the same fields with no annual contract.
Not as a stated document type. Rossum lists invoices, purchase orders, bills of lading, sales orders, and tonnage certificates, and its platform page describes the product as not receipt-specific. Expense receipts differ from invoices in layout, print quality, and field structure, so a platform tuned for supplier invoices is a poor match for a shoebox of thermal paper.
Rossum publishes named customer results rather than a single platform accuracy figure: 90 percent accuracy after 10 documents at the Port of Rotterdam, 92.6 percent after 20 documents at Adyen, and a 71 percent straight-through processing rate at Morton Salt. Note that a straight-through processing rate measures how often no human intervened, not whether the extracted fields were correct.
No. Rossum offers a 14-day free trial and a free demo, but there is no free tier and no self-serve monthly plan. The minimum contract is one year and the published entry point is $18,000 annually, so evaluating Rossum means a demo and a procurement conversation rather than a credit card.
Rossum automates a process: it captures a transactional document, validates it against your master data, routes it for approval, and writes it into SAP or NetSuite. ReceiptOCR performs the reading step only and exports Excel, CSV, JSON, or a QuickBooks-ready file. One replaces a workflow and a team. The other replaces data entry.
No, and that is a real difference worth stating plainly. Rossum pushes validated data and the original PDF into the ERP through native connectors. ReceiptOCR exports a file you import. If automatic write-back, master data matching, and approval hierarchies are hard requirements, a full platform earns its price. If an import file is fine, you avoid the platform entirely.
For most small businesses, yes. An $18,000 annual floor with a one-year minimum is designed for finance organizations replacing several full-time keyers, where the software is measured against a salary line. A company processing a few hundred invoices and receipts a month reaches the same clean spreadsheet with a volume-priced extraction tool and no contract.
What the IDP category includes, and which parts you need.
The rules-based parser comparison, setup time included.
The credits and model-training platform, compared honestly.
The developer API comparison, minimum commitment included.
Read vendor bills into header fields and line items.
How the AP category prices, from capture to payment.
